In August 2025, Moch Subchi Azal Tsani – known as Bechi – was released from prison despite a seven‑year sentence for sexual assault handed down in 2022. The BBC Eye investigation revealed that the teacher, who had been convicted after a high‑profile trial involving a student’s testimony, served less than half of his term before being freed.

Background of the case

Bechi, the son of a prominent Islamic religious leader, taught at the Shiddiqiyyah Islamic boarding school in East Java. In 2022 he was arrested following a 15‑hour siege that saw nearly 1,000 riot police confront a large gathering of his family’s supporters. The court convicted him of sexual assault – a lesser charge than the prosecutors’ request for a 16‑year rape sentence – and sentenced him to seven years in prison.

Details of the early release

The Ministry of Immigration and Corrections told the BBC that Bechi’s release resulted from “sentence remissions granted to him in accordance with applicable regulations.” The ministry declined to explain why his sentence was reduced, and the witness‑protection agency argued that victims should have been informed of his release, a claim the ministry disputed by stating that Bechi remains on parole.

Undercover footage captured Bechi at two public events after his release: an annual prayer gathering at the school in January 2025, and an Eid celebration at his family home in March 2025. In both instances he appeared smiling and was seated beside his father, while filming and photography were prohibited.

Reactions from victims and advocates

Several former students, including the woman whose testimony led to Bechi’s conviction, expressed shock and fear upon seeing the footage. They reported that they had not been notified of his release, despite legal provisions that require victims to be informed. The National Commission on Violence against Women (Komnas Perempuan) has warned of an “emergency” of sexual violence in Islamic boarding schools, noting that the power of religious leaders often shields such institutions from oversight.

Former lawyer Nun Sayuti, who testified at the trial, called the early release a “violation of victims’ rights.” He emphasized that the case highlighted broader systemic issues, stating that many students lack adequate protection mechanisms to report abuse.

Uncertainty and open questions

Analysis: The source confirms that Bechi was released early under the guise of sentence remissions, but it does not disclose the specific legal criteria or the number of remission days applied. The exact process by which the Ministry determined eligibility for early release remains unclear.

Uncertainty: While the Ministry claims the release complied with regulations, the witness‑protection agency’s contention that victims must be informed suggests a possible procedural gap. Further investigation is needed to determine whether the remission was standard practice or influenced by Bechi’s familial connections.

Implications for Indonesia’s justice system

The case underscores tensions between Indonesia’s legal framework and the influence of powerful religious figures. Critics argue that the early release may erode public confidence in the criminal justice system, especially in cases involving sexual violence. Advocacy groups are calling for stricter oversight of parole decisions and for transparent communication with victims.

As Indonesia grapples with calls for stronger protection of students in boarding schools, the Bechi episode serves as a focal point for debates on accountability, the role of religious authority, and the rights of survivors.